The perfect(ish) system

The Evolution of Data is Stalled

Our approach to data has remained largely unchanged since the digital transformation began. We are still treating data as isolated pockets rather than a dynamic, interconnected system. To break free from this fragmentation, we need to rethink how we create, store, and interact with information.

Several issues contributed to today’s fragmented system of disconnected data. Programs existed before “data” as we know it. If the database had come first, the world would likely look very different today. But because programs came first, developers built databases into their programs instead of tying them into one centralized system of data.

This is like every home having its own generator instead of being connected to a power grid—exactly how things used to be when fireplaces and individual generators powered homes. The electric grid changed that. So why is there no “grid” for data?

The biggest reason? Up until now, the fragmented system has worked well enough. It wasn’t until recently that data production exploded at an unprecedented scale, and changing the status quo is difficult. But there’s more to it: corporate interests, security concerns, and a lack of global data standards have also made true data unification nearly impossible. Tech giants benefit from data silos, creating closed ecosystems instead of universal data access. The evolution of data has stalled.

At first, data existed only as the spoken word. Then, it was recorded onto stone, clay, papyrus, and paper. And there it remained for centuries—”ink on paper” was the pinnacle of data’s evolution. The printing press and typewriter didn’t change the fundamental way we stored or accessed information. Then came the computer.

Digital Transformation

Computers allowed data to go digital, replacing pens with keyboards and paper with megabytes. But while the technology surrounding data has advanced—cloud computing, AI-driven analytics, and real-time processing—the way we think about and organize data has remained stagnant. We still treat digital data like paper files, creating isolated systems instead of dynamic, interconnected ones.

The average user doesn’t interact directly with raw data, so they don’t see how outdated and archaic current data systems are—or how dangerous it is to let them remain that way. Instead of layering new apps and integrations on top of a broken system, we need a paradigm shift in the way data is created and used. And while this may sound complicated, the truth is that it’s about simplification.

We need to start designing one centralized database—a scalable system that houses all sub-databases, preventing fragmentation and inefficiency.

Before You Start the Hunt for the Perfect(ish) System

If you’re looking to improve your data management, don’t just jump into another app. Instead:

  • Audit your existing platforms and subscriptions. How many people use them? How vital are they? Get a clear picture of what’s essential and what’s redundant.
  • Consolidate functions. Many business applications have overlapping features. A single, well-integrated platform can replace multiple fragmented ones, saving money and increasing efficiency.
  • Eliminate unnecessary tools. If a system isn’t being used or doesn’t add value, cut it out. The fewer systems in play, the more focused and productive you’ll be.

Taking these steps helps reduce headaches, vulnerabilities, and inefficiencies caused by adding more tools instead of solving the root issue. Companies that break free from the cycle of chasing new apps will finally see data work the way it should.

Why the 'Ish'?

New platforms emerge constantly, making it difficult to choose the “perfect” system. But here’s the truth: there is no perfect system, and there never will be. Once you find one that works, stick with it.

Stop chasing the latest productivity tool. A system is only as good as the process behind it. The more time you spend switching, the less time you spend working. Choose one, commit to it, and master it.

We’ve all seen articles comparing note-taking apps based on features. But features mean nothing in a vacuum. The right system depends on how you think and work.

The Architect, the Gardener, and the Librarian

When choosing a system, consider your work style:

  • The Architect. Enjoys planning, designing processes, and structuring ideas. Needs a tool that allows for clear frameworks and organization.
  • The Gardener. Prefers exploring and connecting thoughts organically. Needs a system that allows ideas to grow and evolve naturally.
  • The Librarian. Loves collecting and categorizing information. Needs a system designed for easy retrieval and reference.

Most people don’t fit neatly into one category. Different projects require different approaches to structuring, growing, and retrieving ideas. But this metaphor helps clarify which system will work best for your thinking style.

Final Thoughts

The way we handle data today is inefficient, outdated, and unsustainable. If we don’t rethink how we create, store, and manage data, we’ll continue to build fragile systems on top of a broken foundation. The solution isn’t more apps or integrations—it’s a shift in mindset. By understanding our needs, consolidating tools, and committing to the right system, we can finally break free from the cycle of inefficiency and make data work for us, rather than against us.

Let’s make your vision a reality!

Want to discuss my work or a challenge you’re facing?  Leave your details and I’ll get back to you